AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ vs EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220
240 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,946
4863 mm
1,906
2141 mm
1,503
1685 mm
3,120
3030 mm
/
5 Doors
/
520 L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
241 BHP - 617
288 - 628 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic & Single-speed AT & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Electric
Electric
425 km - 525 km
410 km
5 - 5
5 - 5
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
617
628 BHP
950
1000 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Motor
/
8
/
options.Lithium
/
460 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+
EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAMG EQE 53 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about price; choose EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3030 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EQE 53 AMG SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.