EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs EQS 580 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
220 km/h
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4946 mm
5216 mm
2103 mm
2103 mm
1503 mm
1503 mm
3120 mm
3120 mm
430 L
430 L
Comfort
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Single-speed automatic (EV)
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
Electric
Electric
760 BHP
525 BHP
1020 Nm
855 Nm
/
/
Motor
9
9
options.Lithium-ion
options.Lithium
560 kW
390–395 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
EQS 580 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 580 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about power; choose EQS 580 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQS 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while EQS 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3120 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while EQS 580 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.