EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs Range Rover Sport 4.4T V8 First Edition (530 PS) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
250 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4946 mm
4946 mm
2103 mm
2043 mm
1503 mm
1820 mm
3120 mm
2997 mm
430 L
450 L
Fuel Economy
/
8.9 Km/L
/
90 L
/
8.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
760 BHP
355 BHP - 575 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed Automatic
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline
540 km
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
3.0 L - 5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
760 BHP
523 BHP
560 kW
/
1020 Nm
750 Nm
/
4.4 L
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
560 kW
/
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Range Rover Sport 4.4T V8 First Edition (530 PS)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about price; choose Range Rover Sport 4.4T V8 First Edition (530 PS) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Range Rover Sport 4.4T V8 First Edition (530 PS) has a fuel consumption of 11.24. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while Range Rover Sport 4.4T V8 First Edition (530 PS) has a wheelbase of 2997 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Range Rover Sport 4.4T V8 First Edition (530 PS) uses All Wheel Drive.