Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4650 mm
4341 mm
1844 mm
1804 mm
1661 mm
1693 mm
2725 mm
2676 mm
846 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
59 L
50 L
13.5 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
252 BHP
115 BHP
352 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
1.6 L - 1998 L
/
105 BHP - 135 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2725 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Equinox 2.0T Premier (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.