ES REEV ULTRA vs H7 2.0T Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
20"
/
4945
5095 mm
1978
1875 mm
1485
1485 mm
3000
2970 mm
Fuel Economy
6.3 L/100km
16.7 Km/L
/
70 L
/
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
Welcome pedal
/
✓
/
4-Way Power
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
ESP
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
/
Battery/Charging
5 min
/
/
/
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
462 HP
204 BHP
345kw
/
634Nm
260 Nm
Motor
2
/
Technologies
L2 ADAS
/
Rear & Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 3.0 L
/
204 BHP - 228 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES REEV ULTRA
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Steering Adjustment
- Driving Recorder
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
H7 2.0T Comfortable
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 2.0T Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES REEV ULTRA if you care more about interior space; choose H7 2.0T Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES REEV ULTRA has a fuel consumption of 15.87, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, H7 2.0T Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES REEV ULTRA has a wheelbase of 3000, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2970 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES REEV ULTRA , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES REEV ULTRA uses Four-Wheel Drive, while H7 2.0T Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.