ES5 2025 425 Pro vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5
5
1615
/
4476
/
1849
/
1621
/
2050
/
462-1423
514
4.99
/
/
64
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
Interior
10.25
11.9
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
14.5
✓
/
4
/
Battery/Charging
0.43h
/
8.5h
/
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
DHT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
MacPherson Strut
/
Multi-link Independent Suspension
/
/
对
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
225/55 R17
/
225/55 R17
/
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
170 BHP
TBD
DHT
DHT
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
170 BHP
/
✓
/
Motor
250
/
1
/
6.6kW
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
Lithium-ion
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
Rear
/
/
489
Technologies
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Individual, Comfort, ECO
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES5 2025 425 Pro
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickES5 2025 425 Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES5 2025 425 Pro if you care more about price; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES5 2025 425 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES5 2025 425 Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES5 2025 425 Pro uses Rear Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.