EV9 GT vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5010
4341 mm
1980
1804 mm
1755
1693 mm
3100
2676 mm
90
414 L
52
/
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
215 - 380
105 BHP - 153 BHP
Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
6 - 7
5 - 5
/
1.3 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
380
115 BHP
283
/
700
156 Nm
4000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EV9 GT
- Power Tailgate
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Security System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Active Safety Warning System
- Lane Keeping Assist
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EV9 GT if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EV9 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EV9 GT has a wheelbase of 3100, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV9 GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EV9 GT uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.