EX90 vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
5037
4440 mm
1964
1833 mm
1747
1560 mm
2985
2700 mm
1675
/
1666
/
/
330 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.5 Km/L
/
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
517 BHP
/
DHT
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
6
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
517 BHP
130 BHP
/
1.8 L
/
170 Nm
Motor
2
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX90
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX90 if you care more about interior space; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX90 has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX90 has a wheelbase of 2985, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EX90, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX90 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.