Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 vs QX60 Sensory Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
/
Dimensions
8
7
5636
5033
2029
1981
1941
1770
3343
2900
592
/
/
170
Fuel Economy
11
8.7
107
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
275/65 R18
/
275/65 R18
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 5.4 L
3.5 L - 3.5 L
300 BHP - 440
265 BHP - 295 BHP
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 8
6 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
3.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
380 BHP
279
637
350
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
QX60 Sensory
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 if you care more about price; choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49. Therefore, Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 has a wheelbase of 3343, while QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 uses Rear Drive, while QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive.