F80 vs AMG GT 63 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
350
315 km/h
8.3 L
3982 cc
/
8
/
GCC
Dimensions
2
2 Seater
4840
4728 mm
2060
1984 mm
1138
1354 mm
2665
2700 mm
/
2 Doors
/
350 L
Fuel Economy
/
4 Km/L
63.5
80 L
/
4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
350 A
/
Transmission
✓
/
8 Speed DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
285/30 R20
/
345/30 R21
/
Key Spec
3.0
4.0 L - 4.0 L
1200 BHP
429 HP - 831 hp
8 Speed DCT
9-speed automatic & AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed & Automatic & SPEEDSHIFT® TCT 9-speed
Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2
2 Seater - 4
Engine
3.0
4.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
1200 BHP
577 BHP
240
800 Nm
24000
/
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
121
/
242 kW
/
242 kW
/
6.16 kW/kg
/
105 kW
/
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
F80
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
AMG GT 63 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickF80
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose F80 if you care more about price; choose AMG GT 63 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, F80 has a fuel consumption of 13.5, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 25. Therefore, F80 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, F80 has a wheelbase of 2665, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AMG GT 63 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. F80 uses No data, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.