Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Dimensions
6
5
19"
19"
5 Doors
/
4720 mm
4660
1865 mm
1875
1710 mm
1670
2785 mm
2720
347 L
/
/
1578
/
176
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
13.3
58 L
51
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
Interior
✓
/
Leather
√
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8.88"
/
√
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
√
✓
/
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
/
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Multilink
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Disk
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6
Gasoline
Gasoline
181 BHP
195 HP
300 Nm
290
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO / NORMAL / SPORT
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Dfsk Fengon 600 M1
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Child Lock
Omoda C7 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOmoda C7 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 if you care more about interior space; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Omoda C7 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 has a wheelbase of 2785 mm, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dfsk Fengon 600 M1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dfsk Fengon 600 M1 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.