Forthing V3 vs Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
Sliding Door
/
/
3 Seater
14"
/
4500
4695 mm
1710
1695 mm
2000
1990 mm
2850
2555 mm
/
4 Doors
/
195 m
Fuel Economy
14
8.3 Km/L
55
65 L
/
8.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Leaf Spring
/
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
125
147 BHP
150
213 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.5 L
/
147 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
3 Seater - 15 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Forthing V3
- Parking sensor rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickUrvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Forthing V3 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Forthing V3 has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, Forthing V3 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Forthing V3 has a wheelbase of 2850, while Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) has a wheelbase of 2555 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Forthing V3, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Forthing V3 uses Front Drive, while Urvan 3-Seater Manual (4-Door) uses Rear Wheel Drive.