GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
197 km/h
4
/
1991 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4412 mm
5110 mm
2020 mm
1925 mm
1616 mm
1847 mm
2729 mm
3043 mm
425 L
487 L
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
9.5 Km/L
65 L
93 L
12 Km/L
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
8-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
302 BHP
290 BHP - 710 BHP
8-speed automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
302 BHP
290 BHP
225
/
400 Nm
353 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDurango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) has a wheelbase of 3043 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.