GLC 200 4Matic vs Lyriq IQ Comparison

Car Information

7.3

5.9

/

440

/

502

/

14.4

Dimensions

5

5

4656

5003

1890

1977

1639

1637

2873

3094

550

/

Fuel Economy

7.1

/

66

/

Transmission

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

2.0

/

211 BHP

340 BHP

Automatic

DHT

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Engine

2.0

/

Gasoline

Electric

211 BHP

340 BHP

350

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GLC 200 4Matic

    • Lyriq IQ

      Review Comparison

      Positive

      • No data found

      Negative

      • No data found

      Positive

      • No data found

      Negative

      • No data found

      Related comparisons

      Editor's PickLyriq IQ

      Expert / Editor Recommendation

      Choose GLC 200 4Matic if you care more about overall equipment; choose Lyriq IQ if you care more about price.

      Popular Car Comparisons

      Mercedes Benz | GLC 200 4Matic

      VS

      BMW | BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i M Sport

      Mercedes Benz | GLC 200 4Matic

      VS

      BMW | BMW X4 2023 xDrive 30i M Sport

      Mercedes Benz | GLC 200 4Matic

      VS

      Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 2.0L R-Dynamic HSE (300 PS)

      Mercedes Benz | GLC 200 4Matic

      VS

      Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2024 2.0L R-Dynamic HSE (300 PS)

      Mercedes Benz | GLC 200 4Matic

      VS

      Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2019 Diesel Platinum

      Q&A

      • According to fuel consumption data, GLC 200 4Matic has a fuel consumption of 14.08, while Lyriq IQ has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
      • In terms of interior space, GLC 200 4Matic has a wheelbase of 2873, while Lyriq IQ has a wheelbase of 3094. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lyriq IQ, offers more room.
      • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC 200 4Matic uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Lyriq IQ uses No data.