GLC 250 4Matic vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4656
4440 mm
1890
1833 mm
1639
1560 mm
2873
2700 mm
550
330 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.5 Km/L
66
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0
/
211 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5
/
Engine
/
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
/
130 BHP
350
170 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLC 250 4Matic
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLC 250 4Matic if you care more about interior space; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLC 250 4Matic has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLC 250 4Matic has a wheelbase of 2873, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLC 250 4Matic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC 250 4Matic uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.