GLC 43 AMG vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
/
5 Seater
/
16
/
4341 mm
/
1804 mm
/
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Interior
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0
1.6 L - 2.0 L
211 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
/
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLC 43 AMG
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLC 43 AMG
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLC 43 AMG if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLC 43 AMG has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLC 43 AMG has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC 43 AMG uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive.