Grand Cherokee 4xe vs Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
194 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4906
4697 mm
1979
1882 mm
1812
1681 mm
2964
2791 mm
/
650 L
Fuel Economy
10.7
14.1 Km/L
72
60 L
/
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/50 R20
/
265/50 R20
/
Key Spec
2.0
1.4 L - 2.0 L
268 BHP
150 BHP - 190 hp
Automatic
7-speed DSG
Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 7
Engine
2.0
1.4 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
268 BHP
150 BHP
/
250 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand Cherokee 4xe
Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent fuel efficiency thanks to the hybrid system
- Modern technologies and luxurious features inside the cabin
- High off-road capabilities
Negative
- The high price of the car compared to competitors
- Relatively short electric driving range
- The weight of the car is heavy compared to non-hybrid models
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickKodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand Cherokee 4xe if you care more about interior space; choose Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand Cherokee 4xe has a fuel consumption of 9.35, while Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand Cherokee 4xe has a wheelbase of 2964, while Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2791 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee 4xe, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Cherokee 4xe uses No data, while Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.