Grand Highlander Limited vs Q3 35 TFSI Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
206 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5116 mm
4385 mm
1989 mm
2019 mm
1781 mm
1608 mm
2964 mm
2603 mm
1639 L
460 L
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
15.4 Km/L
85 L
58 L
9 Km/L
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
266 BHP
150 BHP - 220 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.4 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
266 BHP
150 BHP
420 Nm
250 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand Highlander Limited
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Q3 35 TFSI
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ3 35 TFSI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand Highlander Limited if you care more about interior space; choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand Highlander Limited has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Q3 35 TFSI is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand Highlander Limited has a wheelbase of 2964 mm, while Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Highlander Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Highlander Limited uses All Wheel Drive, while Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive.