Grand Wagoneer 3.0T 4WD vs Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

190 km/h

/

6

Dimensions

7 Seater

7

5 Doors

5 Doors

5758 mm

4828 mm

2387 mm

1943 mm

1920 mm

1792 mm

3302 mm

2916 mm

/

782 L

Fuel Economy

6.2 Km/L

/

100 L

23 Gallon/ 87L

6.2 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Smart Keyless Entry

Interior

/

/

/

/

2nd Row Manual 60:40 Split

Safety

/

/

Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS)

/

Blind Spot Information System

Transmission

/

8AT

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

510 BHP

286 BHP - 470 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

Black

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

510 BHP

293 BHP

678 Nm

350 Nm

/

3.6L V6

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Grand Wagoneer 3.0T 4WD

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Versatility of options for powerful engines
  • Impressive off-road driving capabilities
  • High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies

Negative

  • High fuel consumption for some models
  • High price compared to some competitors
  • Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGrand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Grand Wagoneer 3.0T 4WD if you care more about interior space; choose Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Grand Wagoneer 3.0T 4WD has a fuel consumption of 16.13, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Grand Wagoneer 3.0T 4WD has a wheelbase of 3302 mm, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a wheelbase of 2916 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Wagoneer 3.0T 4WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Wagoneer 3.0T 4WD uses Four Wheel Drive, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo uses All Wheel Drive.