GS3 EMZOOM GB vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1370±41
/
4410±44
4760 mm
1850±18
1930 mm
1600±16
1927 mm
2650±26
2750 mm
145
224 m
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
47
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Electronic Parking
/
225/55 R18
/
225/55 R18
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L
172 BHP - 202 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
4A15J2
/
174
224 BHP
130
/
5500
/
270
387 Nm
1400~4500
/
92
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GS3 EMZOOM GB
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- Seats - Comfort
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GS3 EMZOOM GB if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GS3 EMZOOM GB has a fuel consumption of 6.18, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, GS3 EMZOOM GB is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GS3 EMZOOM GB has a wheelbase of 2650±26, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS3 EMZOOM GB uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.