GX3 PRO GK vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4005
4760 mm
1575
1930 mm
1760
1927 mm
2480
2750 mm
250
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
3.5
12.3
2
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
205/60 R16
/
205/60 R16
/
Key Spec
1.5
2.0 L
100 BHP
224 BHP
CVT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
100 BHP
224 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
387 Nm
Technologies
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GX3 PRO GK
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGX3 PRO GK
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GX3 PRO GK uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.