H6 Active vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
4574 mm
/
1876 mm
/
1685 mm
/
2720 mm
/
463 L
Fuel Economy
14.9 km/L
12.2 Km/L
/
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25 Inch
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
Safety
4
/
No
/
es
/
Yes
✓
Yes
/
Yes
/
Yes
/
Yes
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8 + DTS
/
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/60 R18
/
225/60 R18
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 1998 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
197 BHP - 235
127 - 231
7DCT & Automatic
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Turbocharged
/
4
/
DOHC
/
201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm
231 BHP
105
/
320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm
360 Nm
Technologies
Yes
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Yes
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
H6 Active
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
HS 2.0T Comfort
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHS 2.0T Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose H6 Active if you care more about fuel economy; choose HS 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, H6 Active has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, H6 Active is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, H6 Active has a wheelbase of No data, while HS 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H6 Active uses Front Drive, while HS 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.