H9 Mid vs HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship Comparison

Car Information

/

185

/

380

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

220 km/h

/

4

/

1990 cc

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

4950 mm

4655 mm

1930 mm

1900 mm

1960 mm

1668 mm

2800 mm

2770 mm

750 L

/

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

/

17

90 L

/

9.1 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Sports

Safety

6

/

Front and Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.6

12.6

8

10

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

AT

8-Speed Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/60 R18

/

265/60 R18

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

214 - 251 BHP

166 BHP - 248 BHP

AT & Automatic

7DCT & 8-Speed Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0T

Gasoline

Gasoline

214

248 BHP

380 Nm

380 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Direct Injection+Turbo Charging

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • H9 Mid

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • ABS
  • HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose H9 Mid if you care more about interior space; choose HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

Haval | H9 Mid

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, H9 Mid has a fuel consumption of No data, while HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship has a fuel consumption of 5.88. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, H9 Mid has a wheelbase of 2800 mm, while HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship has a wheelbase of 2770 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H9 Mid, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. H9 Mid uses All Wheel Drive, while HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship uses Four Wheel Drive.