Haval Jolion Basic vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
/
/
514
/
64
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
Interior
3.5
11.9
Colored Combination instrument
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
Dual SRS Airbags
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
4
/
/
14.5
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
DCT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
/
140 BHP - 147 BHP
TBD
Automatic & DCT
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
147 BHP
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Comparison of configuration highlights
Haval Jolion Basic
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Haval Jolion Basic if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Haval Jolion Basic has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Haval Jolion Basic has a wheelbase of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Haval Jolion Basic uses Front Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.