Tank 300 Challenger vs Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
6
5 Doors
/
4760
4995
1930
1960
1927
1760
2750
2920
400 L
/
224
/
/
1985
/
235/55/R20
Fuel Economy
12.1
14.9
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
●
/
●
/
Front door keyless entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Leather+Imitation leather
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Forward collision warning system（FCW）
/
Blind spot monitoring system（BSD）
/
●
/
●
Infotainment
12.3
12.6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
9
10
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson independent suspension
/
Multi-link independent suspension
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
/
Electrical park brake (EPB)
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.0 L - 3.0 L
224 BHP
252 - 337 BHP
Automatic
8AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0T
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
252
387 Nm
380
/
TGDI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
Eco, Comfort, Sport
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 300 Challenger
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats
- 360 Degree Camera
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about price; choose Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats uses Front Drive.