Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT Comparison
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
3
/
2360
/
16
/
5915
/
1950
/
2280
/
3860
/
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1140
/
Fuel Economy
12.6 Km/L
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
/
88 BHP - 277
/
6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual
/
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
3 - 13 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.8
/
Diesel
/
174
/
450
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Remote Central Door Locking
Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Remote Central Door Locking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHiace Van High Roof DSL AT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT has a fuel consumption of 7.94, while Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT has a fuel consumption of 7.94. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT has a wheelbase of 3860, while Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT has a wheelbase of 3860. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT uses Rear Drive, while Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT uses Rear Drive.