Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
8 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
589 L
514
/
64
Fuel Economy
11.5
/
80 L
/
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
Dinamica Microfibre
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Sport Seats Plus
/
11.9
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
14.5
✓
/
9
/
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
/
253 BHP - 285
TBD
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater - 8
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
None
/
4
/
285 BHP
/
355 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pilot 4WD Sport 2025
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Remote key types
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 has a fuel consumption of 8.7, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 has a wheelbase of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pilot 4WD Sport 2025 uses All Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.