HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
161
4
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4630
4287
1890
1836
1663
1504
2750
2705
507
363
Fuel Economy
13.5
/
65
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9AT
/
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
127 - 231
168 BHP - 245
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
400Km
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
231
168 BHP
370
250
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active braking
MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD)
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a wheelbase of 2750, while MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) has a wheelbase of 2705. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.