CarteaCompare CarsHS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats

HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats Comparison

Car Information

6.9

/

Engine / Motor

210

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4630

4680

1890

2065

1663

1730

2750

2705

507

/

/

17

/

4

/

212

Fuel Economy

13.5

16.1

65

55

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

TFT

/

Front Row Seats

/

Fabric

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

4

Transmission

9AT

CVT

/

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

/

Independent strut

/

Multi Link

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Disc

/

Disc

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.5 L

127 - 231

132 BHP - 188 BHP

9AT & Automatic & DCT

Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

231

181 BHP

370

244

/

DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder

/

181 @ 6,000

/

244 @ 4,000

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

AUTO-ECO-SPORT

/

Manual

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active braking
  • X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
  • Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
  • High safety equipment increases confidence while driving

Negative

  • Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD if you care more about price; choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a wheelbase of 2750, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while X-TRAIL S 2WD 7 Seats uses Front Drive.