HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison

Car Information

6.9

12.8

Engine / Motor

210

170

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4630

4323

1890

1809

1663

1653

2750

2585

507

359/1166

/

1318

/

17

/

5

/

145

Fuel Economy

13.5

17.2

65

45

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Drivers and Passenger Airbag

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

10.1

/

/

4

Transmission

9AT

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

127 - 231

112 BHP - 168

9AT & Automatic & DCT

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

Engine

2.0

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

231

118 BHP

370

180

/

88

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active braking
  • ZS 1.5L STD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickZS 1.5L STD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, ZS 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD has a wheelbase of 2750, while ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS 2.0T 9AT LUX 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive.