CarteaCompare CarsHS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship vs CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship vs CRV EX Full Option (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

185

/

380

/

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

200 km/h

4

4

1990 cc

1490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4655 mm

4706 mm

1900 mm

1866 mm

1668 mm

1681 mm

2770 mm

2700 mm

Fuel Economy

17

11 Km/L

/

58 L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Sports

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

10

/

Transmission

8-Speed Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 2.4 L

166 BHP - 248 BHP

184 BHP - 190

7DCT & 8-Speed Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

2.0T

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Direct Injection+Turbo Charging

/

Single Turbo

Single Turbo

4

4

248 BHP

190 BHP

380 Nm

243 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • High reliability and durable performance
  • A wide range of security technologies
  • Excellent fuel efficiency

Negative

  • The price is higher than some competitors
  • Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
  • Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCRV EX Full Option (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship if you care more about fuel economy; choose CRV EX Full Option (AWD) if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Hongqi | HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

Hongqi | HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

Hongqi | HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

Hongqi | HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

Hongqi | HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship has a fuel consumption of 5.88, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship has a wheelbase of 2770 mm, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship uses Four Wheel Drive, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.