ID.4 Pro S vs Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
205 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4584 mm
4855 mm
1852 mm
1860 mm
1636 mm
1465 mm
2765 mm
2805 mm
542 L
450 L
Fuel Economy
/
11.8 Km/L
/
70 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
299 BHP
240 BHP
540 Nm
350 Nm
/
2.0 L
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
157 BHP - 265 BHP
/
AT & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
ID.4 Pro S
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOptima 2.0L T-GDI GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ID.4 Pro S if you care more about power; choose Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ID.4 Pro S has a fuel consumption of No data, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ID.4 Pro S has a wheelbase of 2765 mm, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a wheelbase of 2805 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ID.4 Pro S uses All Wheel Drive, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT uses Front Wheel Drive.