Jeep Gladiator 2024 Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4) vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Car Information

/

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

6

3

/

185

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5539

4.314

1875

1.809

1857

1.624

3487

2.585

/

448

Fuel Economy

8.5

17.2

83

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

CVT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

Key Spec

3.6 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

285 BHP

112 BHP - 168

Automatic

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.6 L

1.3 L

Petrol

Petrol

285 BHP

160 BHP

353

230

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Jeep Gladiator 2024 Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4)

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Active braking
  • MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Jeep Gladiator 2024 Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4) if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Gladiator 2024 Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Jeep Gladiator 2024 Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4) has a wheelbase of 3487, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Jeep Gladiator 2024 Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Gladiator 2024 Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.