Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude vs Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210
6
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
✓
/
4.828
5100
1.943
1994
1.792
1756
2.916
3010
782
566
Fuel Economy
10.0
9.1
93
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
3.3 L
286 BHP - 707 BHP
284 BHP - 345 BHP
Automatic
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
3.3 L
Petrol
Gasoline
290 BHP
345 BHP
350
500
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude has a fuel consumption of 10, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude has a wheelbase of 2.916, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Altitude uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.