Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Limited vs Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
180 km/h
6
4
/
1996 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4828
4914 mm
1943
2207 mm
1792
1842 mm
2916
2900 mm
782
259 L
/
5 Doors
/
225 m
Fuel Economy
10.0
12 Km/L
93
80 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
10
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
2.0 L - 2.3 L
286 BHP - 707 BHP
170 BHP - 296 BHP
8AT & Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
290 BHP
170 BHP
350
405 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Limited
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Limited if you care more about interior space; choose Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Limited has a fuel consumption of 10, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Limited has a wheelbase of 2916, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Limited uses All Wheel Drive, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel uses Four Wheel Drive.