Kona Electric 2025 vs Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
167
/
/
6
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4205
4745
1800
1890
1555
1687
/
2870
Fuel Economy
/
13.5
/
58
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.3 L
150 BHP - 204
280 BHP
AT & Automatic
Automatic
Electric & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
204
280 BHP
395
450
/
3.3 L
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Kona Electric 2025
Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and stylish design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Poor off road performance
- Light noise inside the cabin at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Kona Electric 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Kona Electric 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Kona Electric 2025 has a wheelbase of No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Kona Electric 2025 uses No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.