Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
193 km/h
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5115 mm
4355 mm
1980 mm
1810 mm
1920 mm
1625 mm
2890 mm
2670 mm
1004 L
358 L
221 m
/
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
110 L
63 L
9.4 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 5.7 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
240 BHP - 409
150 - 150
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
271 BHP
150 BHP
385 Nm
197 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Attractive and striking exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Reliable and consistent performance
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- The infotainment system is outdated
- Limited engine choices
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about interior space; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.