Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

200 km/h

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

/

5115 mm

4709 mm

1980 mm

1897 mm

1920 mm

1745 mm

2890 mm

2705 mm

1004 L

331 L

221 m

/

Fuel Economy

9.4 Km/L

14.7 Km/L

110 L

55 L

9.4 Km/L

14.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.3 L - 5.7 L

2.4 L - 3.0 L

240 BHP - 409

165 BHP - 236 BHP

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Automatic & CVT

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

5 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

4.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

271 BHP

181 BHP

385 Nm

245 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Integrated specifications
  • Competitive price value

Negative

  • Engine performance is moderate
  • Limited driving experience
  • Traditional interior design

Related comparisons

Editor's PickOutlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about interior space; choose Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2025 Limited+ 3.6L Plus

Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 Limited 3.6L Plus

Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol XE 3.8L

Toyota | Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2023 3.6L V6 Rubicon X (2-Door)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a wheelbase of 2705 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line uses Front Wheel Drive.