Lotus Exige 2024 Sport 410 vs 2.0 RF Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
290
/
6
/
Dimensions
2 Seater
2 Seater
4084
3915
1802
1735
1129
1240
2370
/
/
16
Fuel Economy
9.9
/
40
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8.8
/
8
/
Bose
Transmission
✓
/
Manual
6-Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
345 BHP - 440 BHP
181 BHP - 181 BHP
Automatic & Manual
6 SPEED SKYACTIV & 6-Speed Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 - 2
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
410 BHP
181 BHP
420
205
/
4000
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lotus Exige 2024 Sport 410
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Seats - Comfort
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
2.0 RF
- Push Button Start
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick2.0 RF
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lotus Exige 2024 Sport 410 if you care more about power; choose 2.0 RF if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lotus Exige 2024 Sport 410 has a fuel consumption of 10.1, while 2.0 RF has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lotus Exige 2024 Sport 410 has a wheelbase of 2370, while 2.0 RF has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lotus Exige 2024 Sport 410 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while 2.0 RF uses Rear Drive.