Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper vs Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210

180 km/h

4

4

/

1996 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

/

4.549

4914 mm

1.860

2207 mm

1.689

1842 mm

2.734

2900 mm

509

259 L

/

5 Doors

/

225 m

Fuel Economy

14.9

12 Km/L

54

80 L

/

12 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

/

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.3 L

216 BHP - 217 BHP

170 BHP - 296 BHP

Automatic

10-Speed Selectshift AT & 6-Speed Selectshift AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Diesel & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Petrol

Diesel

216 BHP

170 BHP

325

405 Nm

/

In-Line

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEverest XLS 2.0T Diesel

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper if you care more about fuel economy; choose Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2.734, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive, while Everest XLS 2.0T Diesel uses Four Wheel Drive.