Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
✓
✓
/
10.9
Engine / Motor
210
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
✓
4.549
4.314
1.860
1.809
1.689
1.624
2.734
2.585
/
448
Fuel Economy
14.9
17.2
54
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
216 BHP - 217 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Petrol
216 BHP
112 BHP
325
150
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro has a wheelbase of 2.734, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk & Co 01 2024 Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.