Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195
185 km/h
1499
1998 cc
/
4
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1440
/
18"
/
4340
4781 mm
1820
1920 mm
1625
1671 mm
2640
2815 mm
1025
500 L
5.5
/
172
187 m
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
15.6
16 Km/L
51
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
Driver Seat
/
12.3"
/
✓
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
✓
/
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macphersan Independent with stabilizer bar
/
Multi-link Independent with stabilizer bar
/
EPAS
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated
/
Solid
/
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.0 L
181 BHP
261 BHP
7DCT
Automatic
Gasoline
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
181 HP
261 BHP
5500
/
290
400 Nm
3500
/
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Economic/Sport/Comfort/Intelligent
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- Seatbelt pretensioner
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus if you care more about overall equipment; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus has a fuel consumption of 6.40, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, RX Comfort 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus has a wheelbase of 2640, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX Comfort 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lynk&Co 06 Core Plus uses Front Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.