M4 Passenger vs Suzuki APV 2016 GLX Comparison
Car Information
MPV
/
Engine / Motor
160
150
/
4
Dimensions
Sliding Door
/
9
8 Seater
2020
/
16
/
5200
4230
1890
1655
1980
1865
3080
2625
160
/
/
2000
Fuel Economy
/
12.0
80
46
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
5
/
5MT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Dual Swing Arm Independent
/
Dependent steel leaf spring suspension
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/65 R16
/
215/65 R16
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.6 L
145 BHP
91 BHP
5MT
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 - 9
2 Seater - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0L VVT
/
145 BHP
91 BHP
185
127
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
M4 Passenger
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
Suzuki APV 2016 GLX
- Rear AC Controls
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki APV 2016 GLX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose M4 Passenger if you care more about interior space; choose Suzuki APV 2016 GLX if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, M4 Passenger has a fuel consumption of No data, while Suzuki APV 2016 GLX has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, M4 Passenger has a wheelbase of 3080, while Suzuki APV 2016 GLX has a wheelbase of 2625. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, M4 Passenger, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. M4 Passenger uses No data, while Suzuki APV 2016 GLX uses Front Wheel Drive.