Mage E2 vs Toyota Corolla 2024 1.6L Active Comparison

Car Information

8.1

11

Engine / Motor

190

190

4

4

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

1480

/

20

4650

4.630

1905

1.780

1630

1.435

2775

2.700

/

368

Fuel Economy

15.8

14.3

51

50

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

10.25

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

13.2

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

AT

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

235/50 R20

/

235/50 R20

/

/

/

Key Spec

1.5

1.2 L - 2.0 L

202 BHP

116 BHP - 168

AT

Automatic & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) With 10 Speed Manual Sequential Mode & CVT & Electronic Continuous Variable Transmission (E-CVT)

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

1600 L

Gasoline

Petrol

202 BHP

121 BHP

305

154

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mage E2

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • Toyota Corolla 2024 1.6L Active

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Electric Curtain - Rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Low fuel consumption
  • High reliability
  • Good resale value

Negative

  • Average engine performance
  • Noise insulation is not perfect
  • Simple interior design

Related comparisons

Editor's PickToyota Corolla 2024 1.6L Active

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mage E2 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Toyota Corolla 2024 1.6L Active if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Dongfeng | Mage E2

VS

Honda | Honda Accord 2023 1.5T LX

Dongfeng | Mage E2

VS

Nissan | Nissan Altima 2022 2.5 S

Dongfeng | Mage E2

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi H5 Flagship

Dongfeng | Mage E2

VS

Honda | Ciciv SPORT

Dongfeng | Mage E2

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Elantra 2024 2.0L GLS

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mage E2 has a fuel consumption of 6.33, while Toyota Corolla 2024 1.6L Active has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, Mage E2 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mage E2 has a wheelbase of 2775, while Toyota Corolla 2024 1.6L Active has a wheelbase of 2.700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E2, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mage E2 uses Front Drive, while Toyota Corolla 2024 1.6L Active uses Front Wheel Drive.