Master L2H2 vs LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

Dimensions

3

2

1934 kg

1230

16

14

5548

4045

2499

1930

3682

2650

3.5T

2000

174 mm

/

10.8m³

3.4m³

/

1665

/

4.9m

/

2075 - 1495 - 1305

/

770

Fuel Economy

100

43

/

14.1 Km/L

Comfort

/

Interior

/

/

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

/

/

/

Safety

Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

7

/

/

2

Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

5-Speed Manual Transmission

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Rear Drive

/

Coil Spring

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

165R14C

/

165R14C

Key Spec

2.3 L - 2.3 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

125 - 125

96 BHP - 96 BHP

6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

Diesel

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

3 - 3

2 - 2

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.3

1.5

Diesel

Gasoline

125

96.5

/

134

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Master L2H2

    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Spare Wheel
    • EBA/BA
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Master L2H2 if you care more about interior space; choose LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Renault | Master L2H2

VS

Toyota | Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT

Renault | Master L2H2

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2024 2.8L Van M/T

Renault | Master L2H2

VS

Toyota | LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT

Renault | Master L2H2

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2021 2.8L Commuter M/T VIP

Renault | Master L2H2

VS

Peugeot | Partner

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Master L2H2 has a fuel consumption of No data, while LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Master L2H2 has a wheelbase of 3682, while LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT has a wheelbase of 2650. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Master L2H2, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Master L2H2 uses Front Drive, while LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT uses Rear Drive.