Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 vs e208 Active+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
150 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
5
5
4660
4055 mm
1795
1960 mm
1435
1430 mm
444
311 L
/
2540 mm
Fuel Economy
18.2
/
51
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
7
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
/
4
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Single Speed Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
195/55 R16
/
195/55 R16
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
153 BHP
136 BHP
/
260 Nm
Key Spec
/
1.2 L - 1.6 L
/
115 BHP - 130 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Seat belt reminder
e208 Active+
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- ABS
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Picke208 Active+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 if you care more about power; choose e208 Active+ if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.49, while e208 Active+ has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 has a wheelbase of No data, while e208 Active+ has a wheelbase of 2540 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 uses Front Drive, while e208 Active+ uses Front Wheel Drive.