Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 vs Volkswagen Golf 2023 1.2L S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
192
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
5
/
4660
4213
1795
1786
1435
1493
444
275
/
2578
Fuel Economy
18.2
20.8
51
60
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
7
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
0.0 L - 1998 L
151 BHP - 153 HP
102 BHP - 296 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
153 BHP
105 BHP
/
175
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Seat belt reminder
Volkswagen Golf 2023 1.2L S
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVolkswagen Golf 2023 1.2L S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 if you care more about power; choose Volkswagen Golf 2023 1.2L S if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.49, while Volkswagen Golf 2023 1.2L S has a fuel consumption of 4.81. Therefore, Volkswagen Golf 2023 1.2L S is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 has a wheelbase of No data, while Volkswagen Golf 2023 1.2L S has a wheelbase of 2578. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Hatchback High 2025 uses Front Drive, while Volkswagen Golf 2023 1.2L S uses Front Wheel Drive.