Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade vs A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
233 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4660
4939 mm
1795
1886 mm
1440
1457 mm
444
530 L
/
2924 mm
Fuel Economy
18.2
16.7 Km/L
51
63 L
/
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
7
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.8 L - 2000 L
153 BHP
180 BHP - 252 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
153 BHP
190 BHP
/
320 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Seat belt reminder
A6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 3 Sedan Entry grade
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade if you care more about price; choose A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a fuel consumption of 5.49, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a wheelbase of No data, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a wheelbase of 2924 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade uses No data, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.