Mazda 6 Entry vs 6 Pure Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
221
210 km/h
/
4
/
2488 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
5 Doors
4865
4870 mm
1840
1840 mm
1450
1450 mm
429
419 L
/
2830 mm
Fuel Economy
/
15 Km/L
/
62 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Cloth
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
9
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6
/
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
151 BHP - 231 BHP
151 BHP - 231 BHP
Automatic & SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Automatic & SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
185 BHP
252
250 Nm
91
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda 6 Entry
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Seat belt reminder
6 Pure
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda 6 Entry if you care more about price; choose 6 Pure if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda 6 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while 6 Pure has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda 6 Entry has a wheelbase of No data, while 6 Pure has a wheelbase of 2830 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda 6 Entry uses Front Drive, while 6 Pure uses Front Wheel Drive.