Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Hyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4275
4.480
1765
1.850
1535
1.650
2570
2.670
240
515
/
✓
Fuel Economy
15.4
12.5
48
62
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.5 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
132 BHP - 190
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
& 7-DCT & AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
148 BHP
153 BHP
192
192
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Hyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Hyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Hyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while Hyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Hyundai Tucson 2018 2.0L Base (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.